This post may contain affiliate links, you can read my affiliate disclosure here.

Do you think you would still foster if your own children were younger? – Foster Care Q&A Series

I’m excited to kick off this Foster Care Q&A series!

We’ve only been fostering for just over four months and I feel like I’ve been made keenly aware at how desperate the need for good foster families in my province (and I’m sure everywhere else too).

Just a warning, if you talk to me and express an interest in fostering I will try to talk you into it. Now you can’t say I didn’t warn you.

Prior to fostering I had a lot of questions and hesitations. With this series I hope to answer questions people have asked me as well as questions I was asking before we started (and in some cases am still asking!). Obviously I’m no expert, I’ve only got 1/3 of a year of experience under my belt, but I want to both help others wade through the decision on whether or not they should foster as well as be honest about our journey.


Foster Care FAQ - Should You Foster When Your Kids Are Little


So, I’ve got a list of questions (and feel free to leave a comment and ask more questions, I’ll add them to my list!) and today I’m kicking the series off with this question that I was asked:


Do you think you would still foster if your own children were younger?


My short answer: No. And Yes.


My long answer is as follows:

A big part of the reason we did not foster when our kids were younger was because our second child came to us via adoption. There is (for good reason) a big emphasis on making sure your child has a healthy attachment when it comes to adoption and I think if we would have started fostering when he was younger he may have felt as though his space in our home was in jeopardy.

When you have a biological child (assuming you are there to raise them for the first few years of their life) they will automatically have a healthy sense of attachment. When you adopt a child at a year and a half who has had a number of different caregivers, who you’ve uprooted from his country and all that he knows, attachment is something you have to be intentional about.

We were very fortunate with Ephraim, he did seem to get it and attach well and quickly to us but I think that is in part because life was very stable for the first five years that he was home with us.

I think if we had started fostering when he was younger it would have been harder for him. He knows he’s adopted and I think things would have gotten a little fuzzy as to why some kids were coming and going and he was staying and would that mean he could leave at any time too?

This was just our particular situation and how we chose to handle it. For Ephraim’s sake I don’t think it would have been smart for us to foster when he was younger, but that’s because of his adoption history, not because of his age.


Foster Care FAQ - Should You Foster When Your Kids Are Little


Now, for the yes side of things.

If we had only biological children or maybe even if we had adopted Ephraim when he was a newborn maybe we would have started fostering sooner. It’s obviously a different situation.

I see a lot of benefits of fostering when your kids are young, like you won’t have the shock of not being able to sleep through the night after being able to do it for years! For that one I think a person is just better off not knowing what they are missing. 😉 (This is kind of a joke and kind of serious. Our first placement didn’t sleep much the first week, our current little guy slept a full 12 hours the first night he was with us, your ability to sleep through the night obviously depends on a lot of factors.)

We wanted to foster kids younger than our own for a number of different reasons (birth order, homeschooling, etc – I could go more in-depth in a separate post if any one is interested) and if you also want to foster younger than your kids that is another thing to consider.

I can think of a ton of reasons for fostering when your own kids are young, here’s a few:

+ there’s the whole, not-completely-out-of-the-sleep-deprived-stage
+ you still have all the baby stuff and probably haven’t gotten rid of it all (twice) like we did
+ you’re still a baby-stage pro and don’t need to re-learn everything
+ fostering will be completely natural to your children


All in all I think what we’ve done has worked best for our family but it doesn’t mean that something else won’t be better for your family.

Have more questions for this foster care Q&A series? Leave a comment below or send me an email!

You can see our foster care timeline here.

Similar Posts